Skip to content

Tesla vs Lucid: Assessing Which Electric Vehicle Stock Offers Better Upside for Investors

Are you looking to invest in the high-growth electric vehicle (EV) market and wondering whether to choose market leader Tesla or newcomer Lucid? As an EV industry analyst and investment advisor, clients often ask me which stock I believe holds better risk-return potential. This comprehensive guide will compare critical metrics between Tesla and Lucid to determine which stock should yield higher returns.

Overview

The electric vehicle industry has soared over the past decade, with Tesla cementing itself as the clear market leader. However, new entrants like Lucid Motors demonstrate the potential to disrupt status quo. As an investor, comparing critical metrics between established incumbents and emerging challengers remains essential to identify promising stocks.

This analysis will evaluate major parameters impacting Tesla and Lucid’s investment outlook:

  • Financial strength and stability
  • Production capacity and technology
  • Demand trends and growth forecasts
  • Competitive positioning
  • Macroeconomic and regulatory risks

Assessing such qualitative and quantitative factors will project each stock’s risk-return profile. This evaluation will also help answer key questions such as:

  • Does Tesla’s pole position make it a safer bet compared to fledgling Lucid?
  • Can Lucid’s technological edge provide higher returns despite nascent operations?
  • What key catalysts and milestones can drive further share price appreciation?

Let’s analyze Tesla and Lucid across various lenses to conclude which stock should reside in well-balanced portfolios.

Tesla Maintains Dominant Market Share

As the pioneer of electric vehicles, Tesla continues consolidating its leadership despite competition from legacy automakers. Tesla produced over 1.37 million EVs in 2022, delivering 1.31 million vehicles. The 50% CAGR in deliveries since 2018 highlightsexponential growth:

Tesla Deliveries CAGR

Tesla’s market capitalization crossed $690 billion as of February 2023, underscoring investor confidence. Record Q4 earnings and ambitious 2023 guidance provide tailwinds for further upside.

The Model 3 and Model Y contributed over 95% of Tesla’s 2021 sales, leading EV charts across major regions like China, Europe, and America. This reflects the mass market demand for affordable, well-designed electric cars.

Tesla Leads Across Key Metrics

Metric 2021 Figure
Revenue $53.8 billion
Net Income $5.5 billion
Gross Margin 30%
Cash Balance $17 billion

Strong margins and consistent profitability provide Tesla financial flexibility to fund expansion plans. With Gigafactories operational across critical vehicle production hubs globally, Tesla maintains hard-to-replicate scale andlocalization advantages.

Lucid Challenges Luxury EV Market

Founded in 2007 as Atieva, Lucid Motors only entered the EV market recently after years of focusing on advanced battery tech. The company went public in 2021 amid tremendous hype over its luxury sedan Air that competes directly with Tesla’s premium Model S.

The Air delivers blistering performance with 900+ horsepower and an industry-leading 500+ mile EPA range. The car has won numerous 2022 Car of the Year awards, outshining the Model S through superior driving dynamics and suave styling.

Lucid Witnesses Exponential Growth

In 2022, Lucid produced 7,180 luxury EVs, delivering 4,369 vehicles totaling revenue over $608 million. By comparison, Lucid only delivered 125 cars in 2021, exhibiting over 3,300% year-over-year growth:

Lucid Deliveries Growth

I believe 2022 marked an inflection point for Lucid with cars shipping in volume on advanced reservations. The company expects to manufacture 50,000 EVs annually by end-2023 as operations stabilize.

Saudi Arabia‘s investment fund PIF owns over 60% of Lucid, financing growth plans. Lucid Energy supplies EV components like battery packs and power units to third parties as well. Formula E partnerships provide testing grounds for energy storage and powertrain tech.

As a luxury player, Lucid skirts mainstream competition in the price-sensitive mid-size sedan and SUV categories. The untapped potential between high-end luxury brands and Tesla’s premium lineup offers abundant growth runways.

Financial Comparison

Analyzing income statements and balance sheets uncovers the yawning gap between Tesla and Lucid‘s standing:

Tesla exhibits substantial scale and profitability:

  • $5.5 billion net income on $53.8 billion 2021 revenue
  • Led by 30% industry-leading gross margins
  • Strong cash reserves with minor debt

Whereas fledgling Lucid remains in high growth, high investment mode with considerable losses forecast:

  • Net loss of $2.8 billion on just $26.4 million revenue in 2021
  • Requires significant capex and R&D expenses before achieving 20,000+ units/year scale
  • Has sufficient current cash balance but additional dilution likely

Mature Tesla offers lower volatility and steadier returns currently. However, early Lucid results mirror Tesla’s trajectory – delivering breakthrough tech initially to luxury customers before mass expansion. If Lucid meets production milestones over the next 4 years, substantial upside exists.

Growth Catalysts

UBS forecasts over 35 million annual EV sales globally by 2025 – a $5 trillion market. Rising environmental awareness and battery improvements leading to purchase price parity will boost adoption. Several catalysts can unlock exponential value for Tesla and Lucid shareholders leveraging this potential:

Tesla Growth Levers

  • Cybertruck Launch: Delayed to early 2024, the futuristic pickup targets the massively profitable truck category
  • Full Self Driving (FSD) Capabilities: Can boost margins by thousands per vehicle with recurring software updates
  • Further Global Capacity Expansion: New factories in Germany and Texas scaling quickly

Lucid Growth Triggers

  • Air Touring Launch: $95,000 entry variant targets wider accessibility
  • Saudi Arabia Manufacturing Facility: New factory to provide regional access complementing Arizona site
  • Battery Pack Sales to Third Parties: Leveraging vertical integration for additional revenue

With ample growth runways, both companies demonstrate potential for further share appreciation.

Competitive Landscape

Tesla’s dominance faces increasing competition from established automakers across price segments:

  • Mainstream Market: Models from VW, Hyundai, Ford, Nissan compete directly with the Model 3 and Model Y.
  • Luxury Segment: Porsche, Audi, BMW, Mercedes launching high-end cars overlapping the Model S and Model X.

However, Tesla continues enjoying advantages from proprietary charging infrastructure, software differentiation, and battery cost leadership. Deep vertical integration across the value chain also boosts margins.

As a luxury player, Lucid sees relatively less exposure to mainstream industry competition in the near term. By competing with Mercedes S-Class and Taycan rather than Toyota Camry or Honda Accord, Lucid has an easier path to carving market share.

Investment Risks

As an investment analyst comparing Tesla and Lucid stocks, I assess the following key risks:

  • Execution: Delays in meeting ambitious production and delivery targets
  • Financing: Potential dilution from ongoing equity and debt funding needs
  • Technology Obsolescence: Competitors may launch superior EV range, charging speed, or self-driving capabilities
  • Economic Conditions: Demand shrinks if consumer confidence deteriorates in major markets
  • Government Policy: EV subsidies and incentives can fluctuate with political changes

While macroeconomic and policy risks affect the overall auto sector, factors like execution and financing warrant greater consideration when comparing EV startups and incumbents.

Verdict: Tesla Remains Lower Risk Bet but Lucid Presents Higher Reward

Evaluating all available data and competing viewpoints, I would highlight the following conclusions around Tesla and Lucid as growth investments:

The base case scenario forecasts Tesla steadily consolidating EV market share given technology leadership and demonstrated execution scaling new vehicle programs. With strong cash flows funding expansion, financial risks appear relatively muted and 25-50% average annual returns seem achievable.

For Lucid, the bull case scenario projects achieving Tesla-like success through technological innovation focused on luxury customers valuing premium branding before mass-market launches. If Lucid executes flawlessly over the next 4-5 years, substantial multibagger 10X+ returns look likely from today‘s levels. However, with only one vehicle currently selling in limited quantities, investing in Lucid warrants caution over foreseeable challenges to rapid verticalization across the EV value chain.

Based on risk appetite, long-term investors should consider allocating a minimum 50-70% EV sector allocation towards Tesla for stability while reserving the balance for higher reward-higher risk stocks like Lucid. I cannot emphasize enough that careful portfolio planning and rebalancing remain crucial.