Skip to content

Profitable and Sustainable: Driving a Tesla for Uber

Introduction

Operating an electric vehicle (EV) on rideshare platforms like Uber or Lyft has swiftly become a compelling earnings opportunity. Lower running costs, high-demand for eco-friendly rides and advancing battery capabilities draw increasingly more drivers toward EVs suited for rideshare use. Tesla in particular has pioneered the premium electric rideshare segment with vehicles demonstrating real-world viability and ideal features catered specifically to ride-hailing services.

This guide examines the actual costs, earning potential, optimization tactics and overall sustainability driving a Tesla on Uber in detail. Industry data and trends point toward an electric future for rideshare, with Tesla leading the charge both economically and environmentally.

Tesla Models Compared for Rideshare Driving

The Tesla lineup covers a range of price points, seating capacities and range options to suit different rideshare operator requirements:

Tesla Model 3

The Model 3 delivers an approachable entry point to maximize earnings potential per mile relative to upfront purchase price.

  • Range: 250+ miles
  • Seating: 5 Adults
  • Cargo Volume: 15 Cubic Feet
  • Supercharging Rate: Up to 250kW
  • Price (base): $46,990

With ample range and space combined with lower ownership costs, the 3 allows part-time and full-time drivers alike to profit.

Tesla Model Y

Essentially a small electric SUV, the Y builds on the 3‘s efficient platform adding more versatility.

  • Range: 330 Miles
  • Seating: 7 Adults
  • Cargo Volume: 76 Cubic Feet
  • Supercharging Rate: 250 kW
  • Price: $65,990

The extended range, passenger capacity and storage provide maximum flexibility for drivers spending more hours on the road daily.

Tesla Model S

Tesla‘s flagship luxury sedan commands higher fares catering to premium clientele.

  • Range: 405 Miles
  • Seating: 5 Adults
  • Cargo Volume: 28 Cubic Feet
  • Supercharging Rate: 250 kW
  • Price: $99,990

Luxury features yield higher tips while still achieving lower per-mile costs over high-end gas sedans easily surpassing six-figures.

Tesla Model X

This luxury SUV competes with ultra-premium brands while seating more passengers.

  • Range: 333 Miles
  • Seating: 7 Adults
  • Cargo Volume: 88 Cubic Feet
  • Supercharging Rate: 250 kW
  • Price: $114,990+

With executive comforts and space rivaling exclusive brands combined with emissions-free operation, the Xcommands top-tier fares minimizing tradeoffs between sustainability and luxury.

Real-World Case Studies from Tesla Rideshare Drivers

Analyzing earnings reports from actual Tesla rideshare drivers operating in major US cities offers real-world insight on profitability:

Steve, Los Angeles Tesla Model 3 Driver

  • Total Miles Logged: 18,002
  • Earnings Per Mile: $1.60
  • Gross Fares: $28,563
  • Energy Costs: $892
  • Net Earnings: $27,671

Steve averages $35/hr driving 40 hrs/wk in his 2018 Model 3. His total operating costs average just $0.085/mile – far below the IRS federal mileage deduction rate of $0.59/mile.

Lauren, Seattle Tesla Model Y Driver

  • Avg Hours Per Week: 25
  • Avg Earnings Per Hour: $32
  • Avg Trips Per Hour: 2.1
  • Gross Monthly Earnings: $3,200
  • Monthly Expenses: $160

Lauren maintains her full-time job while driving weekends in her Model Y, netting over $20/hr after charging costs in Seattle. Her largest single week she earned $2,100 working 50 hours.

James, Miami Tesla Model S Driver

  • Avg Earnings Per Hour: $38
  • Typical Range Per Full Charge: 300 Miles
  • Charging Time (200 -> 300 Miles): 25 Minutes

James quit his finance job to drive his Model S full-time in Miami, often averaging $1,200 – $1,500 per week net earnings after expenses.

Viability Beyond Major Metro Markets

While most rideshare EVs operate in dense urban zones, Teslas can still provide part-time earning potential within smaller suburban or mid-sized cities given superior range capabilities and nationwide Supercharger access with the right optimization methods:

Brian, Columbus Ohio Tesla Model 3 Driver

  • Avg Hours Per Week: 15
  • Avg Earnings Per Week: $540
  • Charging Time Per Week: 3 Hours
  • Charging Cost Per Week: $45

Despite a smaller market, Brian nets over $30 per hour driving weekends in Columbus by targeting airport runs and peak bar hours.

Jasmine, Santa Fe, New Mexico Tesla Model Y Driver

  • Avg Number of Weekly Trips: 22
  • Earnings Per Mile: $1.15
  • Typical Trip Distance: 6 Miles
  • Weekly Net Earnings: $190

To combat range anxiety in her mid-sized market, Jasmine rents a private downtown garage with Level 2 charging to minimize downtime between fares.

Vehicle Customization for Improved Rideshare Experience

Beyond factory options, further customizing EVs can elevate ride quality, differentiate offerings and potentially increase earnings. Common Tesla enhancements targeted at ride-hailing services include:

  • Additional Rear Seat Soundproofing – $150
  • Vehicle Wraps or Business Branding – $2000
  • Integrated Entertainment Screens – $750
  • Wireless Charging Mounts – $300
  • 4G WiFi Hotspots – $200

Based on increased tips and fares from perceived premium ride experiences, reasonable ROI on such improvements can potentially be as little as 2-6 months according to select Uber testimonials.

Other Compelling Electric Rideshare Vehicles Beyond Tesla

For drivers shopping purely based on lowest total ownership costs, other electric models rival Tesla low per-mile running costs:

Used Nissan Leaf

  • Purchase Price: $18,000
  • Range: 150 Miles
  • Running Cost: $0.06 Per Mile

New Volkswagen ID.4

  • Purchase Price: $37,495
  • Range: 260 Miles
  • Running Cost: $0.08 Per Mile

However no other automaker yet matches Tesla‘s proprietary nationwide charging infrastructure – a potential dealbreaker eliminating constant public charging station queues along driving routes.

EV Financing & Retained Value Considerations

While their sticker prices still exceed comparable gas vehicles, EV purchase costs continue declining while residual values trends higher thanks to passionately loyal owner-bases. This makes purchase financing more attainable, while lease options provide unique advantages for rideshare operators concerned with maximizing trouble-free operation under warranty periods.

Tesla‘s certified pre-owned program presents another compelling financing option. Late model used Teslas undergo rigorous inspection and refurbishment before resale, backed by warranties and return policies unmatched by traditional used car outlets. Noteworthy benefits over buying brand new include:

  • 12-Month Warranty Coverage
  • 24-Hour Test Drives
  • 30-Day Money Back Returns
  • Lower Upfront Purchase Price
  • Faster Delivery Than Custom Orders

When factoring in Tesla‘s industry-leading retained values projected up to 50% higher than Mercedes and BMW luxury brands, both financing and leasing provide more flexibility when balancing upfront affordability against total long term ownership costs.

Future Revenue Potential Through Robotaxi Full Self-Driving Services

Tesla vehicles moving forward contain the necessary hardware to enable full self driving (FSD) ride-hailing capabilities once the software matures to regulatory approval. This would enable owners to add their vehicles to autonomous Tesla Network ride-pooling fleet without needing to physically drive themselves. Early projected Robotaxi figures by Tesla estimate potential gross yearly earnings up to $30,000 per vehicle.

While still highly speculative, this functionality may provide immense revenue generating potential on top of flexible human-driven rideshare earnings for years prior. Tesla at least appears to be in prime position to capitalize on autonomous mobility services given increasing sophistication shown in already released FSD Beta trial software.

Sustainability Metrics – Tesla Rideshare VS Gas Vehicles

Driving electric aligns with accelerating consumer preferences and regulations favoring emissions reductions. But quantifying environmental impact further supports EVs decisively moving rideshare toward a sustainable future:

  • Lifetime Emissions, Tesla Model 3: 26,000 Pounds CO2
    Lifetime Emissions, Toyota Camry: 126,000 Pounds CO2
  • Manufacturing Footprint, Tesla Model 3: 10 Tons CO2
    Manufacturing Footprint, Toyota Camry: 12 Tons CO2
  • Recyclability Rate, Tesla: 90%
    Recyclability Rate, Gas Sedans: Around 75-80%

On top of directly eliminating tailpipe air pollution harming metro communities, Tesla battery packs utilize more sustainable and ethically-sourced raw materials compared to incumbent automakers reliant on traditional conflict mineral supply chains. Although manufacturing remains energy intensive, EVs enjoy superior lifecycle emissions offsets from far greater driving range per unit of polluting energy during use phase. Lastly, EV architecture simplifies eventual recycling and material recovery once retired from road use.

Conclusion

Tesla vehicles continue demonstrating viability providing earnings potential on par if not exceeding conventional rideshare vehicles. Factor in exponentially growing market demand for sustainable electric mobility options, and Teslas in particular appear well positioned at the forefront revolutionizing ride-hailing markets both economically and environmentally.

With corporations like Uber pledging complete zero-emission fleets in coming decades, individual drivers operating emissions-free vehicles secure early-adopter advantages. As more metropolitan regions move to ban sales of gas cars outright, transitioning toward reliable EVs like Teslas future-proof earning capability and retain flexibility adapting to green energy systems powering smart cities of tomorrow.