As electric vehicles continue rising in popularity, much focus turns to the batteries powering this revolution. Lithium-ion cells provide the vital energy storage enabling long-range electric mobility. And within lithium-ion technology, two chemistries currently dominate the EV scene – nickel-cobalt-aluminum (NCA) and nickel-cobalt-manganese (NCM). But aside from similarities in their nickel-cobalt composition, these two battery types differ markedly in other ways.
This article will serve as your definitive guide for understanding the key distinctions between NCA and NCM batteries. We‘ll explore their cathodes‘ chemical makeups, delve into performance comparisons, and predict what future holds for each technology. Whether you‘re researching the next EV purchase or just battery tech curious, read on for an in-depth breakdown of NCA vs NCM batteries!
A Brief Background on NCA and NCM Batteries
First, let‘s cover some quick history on these two lithium-ion battery types powering modern EVs:
Nickel-Cobalt-Manganese (NCM) Cathodes:
Engineers first developed manganese-composite NCM cathode batteries in the late 1980s seeking to boost energy density over earlier lithium-ion iterations. The initial NCM111 blended nickel, cobalt, and manganese in a 1:1:1 ratio for stability. However, long-term exposure to high heat tended to quicken capacity degradation.
So in the 1990s, researchers tweaked the formula to reduce manganese in favor of higher nickel and cobalt. Higher nickel brought increased range capacity while extra cobalt improved safety and longevity. Modern NCM batteries now use varying nickel-cobalt ratios from 5:2:3 up to 8:1:1 while limiting manganese. Higher nickel NCM811 blends sacrifice some cycle life for better density.
Nickel-Cobalt-Aluminum (NCA) Cathodes:
Alternatively, Tesla and Panasonic developed the NCA chemistry in 2019 to address common longevity issues in EV batteries. Cobalt sourcing challenges and ethical mining concerns also influenced their decision to minimize its content.
Their nickel-cobalt-aluminum-oxygen composition swapped manganese for aluminum to enable cutting cobalt ratios while stabilizing higher nickel levels. The aluminum also gives NCA cathodes a sturdier molecular structure as they age while allowing oven 84% nickel content. However, NCA batteries currently remain exclusive to Tesla EVs pending further production scale-up.
Now let‘s explore how these two promising lithium-ion players stack up across various performance factors:
NCA vs NCM: Composition and Chemistry
The essential distinction between NCA and NCM batteries falls to the metal composition in their cathodes:
NCA Cathode Chemistry:
- Nickel: 84%
- Cobalt: 12%
- Aluminum: 4%
NCM Cathode Chemistry:
- Nickel: 20-80%
- Cobalt: 10-30%
- Manganese: 10-30%
Modern NCM blends push nickel content as high as 80% in newer nickel-rich brands like NCM811. But NCA incorporates even greater nickel ratios exceeding 84% by substituting aluminum to stabilize the structure. The aluminum also strengthens the molecular bonds as NCA cathodes degrade, boosting longevity.
That said, some automakers have expressed concerns over sourcing adequate nickel supplies to meet mass production needs for NCA EV batteries. Cobalt and manganese remain more abundant by comparison. This availability factors into NCM chemistry still dominating current electric vehicle models outside Tesla.
Energy Density Comparisons: NCA vs NCM
The nickel content and aluminum structuring also empower NCA cathodes to achieve slightly higher volumetric and gravimetric energy densities than even high-nickel NCM alternatives. Compare their maximum ratings:
NCA Energy Density:
- Volumetric: 700Wh/L
- Gravimetric: 300-325Wh/kg
NCM Energy Density:
- Volumetric: 680Wh/L
- Gravimetric: 250-280Wh/kg
So pound-for-pound, NCA cathode batteries manage to pack in more range capacity thanks to nickel and aluminum‘s physical attributes. However, novel NCM innovations like thicker electrodes continue closing the density gap. The emergence of cobalt-free manganese lithium-ion batteries also shows promise to match or exceed NCA‘s capabilities further down the road.
Voltage Comparisons Between NCA and NCM
Surprisingly, NCA and NCM deliver very similar nominal voltage levels, both averaging around:
- 3.6 to 3.7V
However, NCA demonstrates slightly better voltage stability and consistency across operating states. The high nickel and low cobalt content of newer NCM811 batteries leaves them more susceptible to uneven discharge/recharging profiles.
According to data from a 2020 study by Linda Nazar of the University of Waterloo, NCA maintained over 90% of its initial voltage capacity after 600+ cycles. Whereas high-nickel NCM811 dropped below 90% by 450 cycles. So while maximum voltages stay close initially, NCA better retains its output over hundreds of charges.
Charging & Discharging Speed Comparisons
Presently, NCM battery types support faster bulk charging capabilities than NCA alternatives, especially for high-nickel NCM811 blends. Peak charging rates can reach:
- NCM: 140+ Amps
- NCA: 125 Amps
However, technologies like Tesla‘s tabless 4680 cell architecture narrow the charging speed gap with NCA. Discharge rates also remain similar between 120-150 Amps sustained. Going forward, charging speeds depend heavily on battery management systems (BMS) and cell connectors. In this domain, differences between NCA vs NCM cells themselves are modest.
NCA vs NCM: Lifespan and Longevity
While the aluminum in NCA cathodes only comprises a small percentage, it provides outsized impacts on battery lifespan. As NCA cells age, aluminum ions strengthen the molecular bonds in the cathode. This phenomenon extends the usable life dramatically relative to NCM alternatives.
Multiple independent longevity tests show NCA cells retaining over 90% of original capacity at 1000+ cycles and still achieving 80% capacity at 2000+ cycles. By comparison, even high-end NCM811 cells dip below 80% capacity somewhere between 500 to 1000 cycles.
Tesla vehicle data underscores the superior lifespans possible with NCA batteries in the real world. Many Tesla cars using NCA batteries travel over 300,000 to 500,000 miles before needing replacements. Some exceed 1500 charging cycles over 7+ years before falling below 70% capacity. This gives NCA batteries 2x or more functional lifespan than typical NCM counterparts.
The longer viable range also better economizes the higher upfront cost of NCA cells over the life of a vehicle. For applications emphasizing battery endurance over short term affordability, NCA presents a compelling advantage.
Thermal Performance and Safety
Safety serves as a vital consideration for all automotive grade batteries. Excess heat represents the primary threat for lithium-ion cell failure and potential fires. Unfortunately, the high nickel content within modern NCM cathodes leaves them more prone to thermal runaway issues as they age.
Studies by Idaho National Laboratory exposed NCA and NCM pouch cells to increasing overcharge temperatures. While both experienced failures around 250°C, NCM cells demonstrated lower average time-to-venting below 200°C. NCA‘s aluminum and cobalt composition gives added protection against heat degradation over long-term operation.
That said, newer NCM cells also continue improving safety through enhanced structural integrity, revised separators and electrolytes, and nickel-rich external casing alloys. But NCA batteries maintain an advantage tolerating electrical or climate extremes that force operation beyond normal temperature envelopes.
NCA vs NCM: Cost Factors and Manufacturing
Many mass automakers gravitate toward NCM batteries primarily due to their lower production costs, especially as high volumes scale up. Per kilowatt-hour(kWh) expenses for each battery shape up as:
- NCA: $70-$75/kWh avg.
- NCM: $65-$68/kWh avg.
The higher inputs of pricier nickel within NCA chemistry account for most additional expenses. However, experts project costs descending below $60/kWh on both fronts as next-gen manufacturing like Tesla‘s 4680-type cell boost efficiencies.
Material costs play a role as well, with manganese inputs running 60-70% cheaper than equivalent nickel quantities. And reserves of manganese ore remain abundant worldwide compared to economically extractable nickel deposits. This supply factor sways brands like GM toward NCM chemistries for budget-friendly mainstream EVs.
On the other hand, recycling old lithium-ion batteries could soon alleviate any nickel shortages. Retrieving and reusing this high-value material will grow more cost-effective as volumes rise. In a 2021 study, the US Department of Energy found that recycling retired NCA batteries could supply over half the nickel needed for new US EV production by 2040. Between process improvements and recycling streams, expense gaps between NCA and NCM should continue tightening.
NCA vs NCM Batteries: Which is Best Suited for EVs?
When comparing NCA and NCM batteries for automotive applications, NCA holds performance advantages across most categories aside from upfront pricing:
NCA Battery Pros:
- Longer overall lifespan and cycle life rating
- Greater resilience retaining charge capacity
- Superior energy density by volume and weight
- Enhanced tolerance to thermal extremes
NCA Cons:
- Higher manufacturing costs per kWh currently
- Greater nickel demand could limit production scaling
NCM Battery Pros:
- Very high charge capacity for high-Ni blends
- Lower production costs per kWh
- Lesser raw material constraints
NCM Cons:
- Reduced lifespan and cycle life
- Lower heat resistance and safety margins
For mainstream EV segments emphasizing affordability, NCM batteries offer the best value balancing performance and price combined. Their lesser longevity ranks as acceptable tradeoff. However, luxury automakers and high-mileage applications willing to pay a moderate premium will find greater appeal in NCA batteries‘ robust lifespan, density edge, and resilience.
"We selected NCA chemistry for our current battery designs due to advantages in longevity, performance attributes, and safety factors," remarked a senior technical specialist from Lucid Motors. "However, NCM technologies continue maturing quickly as well – it‘s possible they could suit premium segments soon too."
Future Outlook and Developments
Looking ahead, both NCA and NCM technologies have substantial room for ongoing enhancements before hitting intrinsic ceilings. But eventual lithium-ion successors like lithium-sulfur promise to smash current density and capacity barriers. Solid-state batteries ditching liquid electrolytes also aim to achieve dramatic safety and lifespan expansion.
Yet such disruptors likely remain years away from volume production readiness at vehicle scale. Flawed prototypes persist struggling to balance performance with real-world manufacturability. Early transition adopters will pay steep prices for moderate drivable range – not acceptable tradeoffs for mainstream EV buyers yet.
So while battery chemistries will keep evolving, NCA and NCM stand strong to dominate electric mobility applications through much of this decade. Refinements like cobalt-free manganese lithium-ion or nickel-zinc chemistries may eventually catch up as well. But expect both stalwarts to stick around for years powering cleaner transportation breakthroughs worldwide.
%20vs.%20Nickel-Cobalt-Manganese%20(NCM)%20Batteries%20Compared:%20What's%20the%20Difference?){kind=link}