Jordan Maxwell and the Dark World of Maritime Law
The occulted knowledge research specialist Jordan Maxwell has bold views when it comes to the legal system many assume they understand. According to him, a hidden component of international Admiralty Law determines not only critical elements of global commerce but also the status and presumed ownership of individuals themselves. In an interview on maritime law, Maxwell argues that human beings are seen as little more than cargo vessels lost at sea to be claimed and directed through secret mechanisms of maritime jurisdiction. These rather sensational assertions certainly demand deeper analysis and scrutiny through the lens of what legal and occult scholars argue.
The Ancient Waves: Origins and Evolution of Admiralty Law
To analyze Maxwell‘s perspective, it is useful to trace Admiralty Law back to its roots and key developments. Known as maritime law, private admiralty law or commercial law, Admiralty deals with maritime commerce disputes, sailor rights, sea travel, ocean navigation issues and rules of conducting warfare at sea. Considered one of the world‘s oldest bodies of law, Admiralty originated from a collection of ancient Mediterranean maritime principles, rules and customs known as Lex Rhodia in 500 BC. This early sea code developed further during the Roman Empire for handling maritime legal issues before becoming fragmented by the fall of Rome in the 5th century AD. Over the next centuries, a range of coastal northern European sea and trade powers like Aragon, Norse raiders, Hanseatic League merchants and seafaring Italian city states created dedicated admiralty courts and laws to manage commerce and sea disputes. By 1389 Britain began centralizing admiralty courts with the Crown asserting wider controls by the Court of Admiralty before jurisdiction was given to the Vice Admiralty Courts established in maritime colonies by 1689.
As British Admiralty laws developed globally through the expansion of naval and commercial maritime power, sea laws of colonial rivals like France and Spain also spread through exploration and conquest. Over centuries, complex competing and overlapping admiralty laws, court jurisdictions, customs, flags and enforcement developed through sea wars and alliances that necessitated further international codes and treaties right up to modern times. For all the moral issues of colonization, it was certain that the extensive reach of admiralty law helped cement far-flung global commerce into a system of common commercial maritime principles, agreements and courts.
Salvage Laws and Ownership Rules for Lost Vessels at Sea
When examining Maxwell‘s analogy that people seem claimed as cargo vessels in admiralty court settings, it is interesting to compare processes like historic maritime salvage laws that permit taking ownership and control of lost ships and/or cargo. Customs and treaties have established that those finding apparently lost ships at sea may claim ownership if vessels demonstrate no obvious nationality, identification markings nor living crew members able to properly defend ownership. While considered legally and morally complex, maritime salvage and related international Lost and Found laws do provide mechanisms where finders even of fully functional ghost ships may take control of incredible fortunes theoretically lost or abandoned at sea. There do appear to be deeply questionable aspects of implied capture and diversion of assets by these types of customary maritime laws still active today.
Entering the Docks of Admiralty: Courts as Harbors Managing Human Vessels?
According to Jordan Maxwell, when an individual enters a seemingly common legal courtroom today, they are in fact entering a court following the procedures of international maritime Admiralty law. In this view, people become seized and captured as cargo vessels lost at sea by Lost and Found policies as human assets to be processed and directed.
Examining aspects of courts relating to maritime law, judges do enter by docks and chambers followed by cryptic symbols. They sit elevated directing actions like a harbormaster oversees cargo ships operation below by piers and bridges while garbed officials assume roles like bailiffs, remembrancers and court criers managing maritime affairs. Defendants and plaintiffs present petitions as captains state fortunes to be considered while judges carefully direct payments between parties rather than weighing individual claims of rights and liberties. The entire process does appear oriented to process plaintiffs and defendants like cargo vessels making requests before localized harbormasters.
The Status and Identification of Captured Human Vessels
Building on the view that courts manage people through maritime policies, occult scholars like Maxwell assert great importance in how individual names appear in legal settings. They argue whenever an individual’s name is written in full capitalization as a family name (surname) followed by a first personal name, this transforms them into merely an artificial entity before the court rather than an assumed natural human being with civil rights. Just as foreign vessel craft require external lawyers to petition local maritime boards in unfamiliar ports for transit rights so, Maxwell argues, all capitalized names aboard courts require “representatives” to petition judges to award privileges and direct monies rather than argue inherent Constitutional liberties Americans assume are guaranteed. This appears to parallel internal maritime procedures for impounded foreign vessels requiring advocates to petition for specific case privileges rather than assume previous rights and permissions under local laws.
Maxwell further notes how judges rule and direct strictly financial payments between capital named vessel entities rather than weigh justice, forensic facts and complex arguments about rights and personal liberties typical of common law criminal proceedings. There is the sense that humans enter admiralty settings strictly as corporatedummy plaintiff/defendants by implication of capitalized names where judges, like heads of a shipping transfer station, then rule on monetary transactions between two crafts from different shores based on arguments presented by their assigned harbor pilots.
Hidden Powers of Admiralty Law and Global Control
The enormous implications suggest admiralty law establishes a hidden tier of power concerning global control certain groups may employ by presenting and addressing fellow humans essentially as ships hauling cargo rather than beings with natural liberties and rights. Through implying lost souls require capture and assignment of vessel identities entering courts, occulted admiralty law may steer humanity silently into a collective “dry dock” where judges simply direct flow of energy between secretly owned and projected legal dummy entities. Like drifting foreign ships implicitly seized by claims of abandonment, people certainly do appear secretly captured by admiralty processes clearly benefitting elite interests and denying individuals previous national rights and Constitutional protections taken for granted outside court environments.
Signals and Symbols Reflecting Admirality Customs
If Admiralty Law forms an important legal basis—including international commerce and local courts—do customs and symbols signal these maritime roots? Jordan Maxwell and other occult scholars suggest public legal spaces today still integrate terminology, rituals and objects reflecting Admiralty traditions and jurisdictions over claimed sea commerce assets. Nautical flags with golden fringe and pole spear finials resembling masts, judges entering by “docks” wearing priest-like robes of office, elevated platform benches ruling from “bridges”, attorneys walking bow-like wooden rails to present “briefs”, commands to “appear” and “stand” before jurisdictions, “courts” being steered as “chambers” managing contractual crew conflicts, the use of obscure case “dockets” and “anchor” symbols to register proceedings, and calling for order by three strikes of a gavel “bell” or “ships bell” all point to maritime customs persisting in courts legally processing people while oblivious masses assume familiar justice scales iconography means they individually steer destinies by Constitutional compasses.
Origins of Personal Corporate Identities in Admiralty Law
Perhaps most profoundly, Maxwell and others feel Admiralty Law may actively create fictional corporate dummy counterparts attached from birth to humans that allowing legal processes treating living beings essentially like naval resources. They examine doctrines like the Admiralty concept of a fictitious corporate entity or strawman created and attached to humans at birth featuring all capitalized name conventions. This wholly legal fiction strawman functions as a dummy corporate merchant vessel at sea that the real living individual allegedly interfaces as benefactor and surety over its activities. Binding Strawman Origin Birth Certificates created at first breath containing rules for future asset engagement makes sense when one examines parallel Tagged and Claimed Asset documents prepared when vessels set sail to manage cargo against loss or legal claims. Humans appear bound by implied consent to a life representing a corporate maritime fleet of one—with the living individual installing as captain of a Strawman Vessel representing sunken treasure in human capital literally at sea and salvaged by courts unless individuals wake up, rise up and thereby unlock dormant liberties and rights.
Conclusion: Fathoming the Depths of Hidden Admiralty Influence
Jordan Maxwell and other occulted law researchers again assert that what we see on the surface of complex legal and social systems barely clues us in to highly veiled dynamics below. Comprehending elements of Admiralty Law and maritime jurisdiction in courts and global commerce should open our minds to deeper questions. Are we self-directed captains conscience of sailing by free will or empty vessels claimed as derelict crafts of admiralty law? Should aspects of naval customs in names, seals, phrases and judges robes concern us or are these vestiges of historic justice now devoid of previous symbolism? Do the capitalized names truly change real living people before courts or is this speculative folly keeping us from arguing Constitutional liberties clearly established? Just how far could thorough analysis go in determining if international maritime admiralty forms occulted depths of globalist control? The journey to find out promises rough seas for researchers, calm for power structures and potentially liberating shores for populations tired of drifting through legal fictions barely fathomed!