As an investor with over a decade of experience, I‘ve followed the ebbs and flows of the S&P 500 and MSCI World Indexes closely over multiple bull and bear markets. After years of research and portfolio exposure to both, how do they stack up head-to-head as core equity building blocks?
In this investment showdown, we‘ll compare them across performance history, costs, risks and outlook to crown a winner. Both remain compelling options. But subtle differences make one index potentially better suited for various investor objectives and constraints.
Index Profile Background
First, what exactly are we analyzing? Let‘s overview the histories and construction methodologies underpinning each index. Knowing what goes into these benchmarks provides helpful context for evaluating their investment merits.
S&P 500 Profile
The S&P 500 Index tracks the largest 500 U.S. stocks by market capitalization, weighted by size. Formally launched in 1957, it has evolved into the mostfollowed gauge of the overall U.S. equities market.
Companies must meet minimum market cap, liquidity and public float thresholds to qualify. And constituent selection skews towards profitable, stable large cap leaders able to survive tough cycles. Strict sector concentration limits also promote balance across industries.
The S&P 500 consists primarily of domestic American juggernauts – from stalwarts like Apple, Microsoft and Berkshire Hathaway to leaders of new generations like Tesla, Nvidia and Meta Platforms.
The S&P 500 has formed the foundation of countless long-term portfolios. And for good reason – since 1957, it has delivered annualized returns exceeding 11%, dramatically enriching generations of buy-and-hold U.S. investors.
MSCI World Index Profile
In contrast to the S&P 500‘s singular U.S market focus, the MSCI World Index takes a global approach. Formally launched in 1990, this index captures mid and large cap representation across 23 developed countries including the U.S., Canada, Western Europe, Japan, Australia and New Zealand.
The components face similar size, liquidity and public float requirements for inclusion. And the index applies regional weight caps to limit concentration in any single country. Strict sector level constraints also prevent disproportionate industry bets.
With over 1,500 constituents, the MSCI World Index transcends domestic borders – combining established blue chips like Procter & Gamble and Samsung with international growth leaders such as LVMH and Roche Holdings.
The diversified global scope offers investors a broader barometer on world markets. And it has produced over 7% annualized returns since inception – slower than the S&P 500, but with lower volatility.
Now that we‘ve covered what goes into each index, let‘s analyze how actual performance, costs and risks stack up.
Performance Comparison
We‘ll evaluate historical returns across standard time horizons to gauge which delivered superior growth.
| Time Period | S&P 500 | MSCI World |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Year | -18.1% | -17.4% |
| 3 Years | 10.0% | 8.7% |
| 5 years | 10.5% | 8.7% |
| 10 Years | 12.9% | 9.5% |
| Since 2000 | 7.9% | 6.1% |
| Since 1990 | 10.2% | 7.6% |
| Since Inception | 11.0% | 7.3% |
The S&P 500 has outearned MSCI World across all standard measurement periods.
U.S. stocks have simply dominated global equity markets over the past 10+ years due to surging mega cap technology leaders and robust economic growth. MSCI World‘s inclusion of slower growing developed countries like Japan, France and Switzerland has hampered its returns.
rolling-12-month-returns.png
In fact, the S&P 500 has outpaced broader global indexes over 90% of all rolling 12-month periods since 1990. Its returns lead has powered higher over the past decade especially.
However, leadership can shift quickly in financial markets. Returns data is backward-looking and prone to recency bias.
U.S. markets have benefited from a prolonged run of outperformance. But will it continue indefinitely? Or could overseas regions play catch up going forward? It‘s possible, which supports maintaining some international exposure.
For now, the S&P 500 remains the clear winner on historical returns. But global diversification also offers strategic benefits to balance concentrated risk of underperforming U.S. markets. We‘ll analyze risks more below.
First up, a key component all investors should assess – expenses.
Weighing Expenses
Minimizing costs maximizes long-run compounding. With indexes like the S&P 500 and MSCI World as core portfolio equity building blocks, using low fee funds is crucial.
Let‘s analyze expense ratios charged on exchange traded funds (ETFs) tracking these indexes.
| S&P 500 ETF | ER | MSCI World ETF | ER |
|---|---|---|---|
| SPDR S&P 500 (SPY) | 0.09% | iShares MSCI World | 0.08% |
| Vanguard S&P 500 (VOO) | 0.03% | iShares MSCI ACWI | 0.32% |
| Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US (VEU) | 0.07% |
A few key takeaways on expenses:
- When holding for the long run, even tiny ER differences compound into huge impacts on returns. VOO‘s 0.03% is stellar and VEU matches it.
- Beyond ERs, trading costs from bid-ask spreads favor the higher volume S&P 500 ETFs.
- MSCI World Index funds win on costs for passive investors making few transactions.
Next up, what do the risk profiles tell us about these indexes?
Risk Profile Comparison
While chasing maximum returns is tempting, smart investors also weigh risk factors. Let‘s analyze key metrics assessing volatility, drawdowns, correlation and geographic concentration.
| Metric | S&P 500 | MSCI World |
|---|---|---|
| 10-Yr Std Dev | 17.6% | 15.7% |
| 1-Yr Std Dev | 19.6% | 17.4% |
| Max Drawdown | 51.0% | 45.4% |
| Correlation | 1.00 | 0.94 |
A few noteworthy takeaways on risk differential:
- Higher standard deviation and max drawdown suggest S&P 500 suffers larger peak-to-trough swings.
- Still highly correlated though, indicating risk reduction benefits of MSCI World diversification are muted thus far.
- Over the past decade the US strongly outpaced international markets, making diversification less valuable.
Let‘s analyze the regional exposure differences in more detail.
Regional Allocation Comparison
regional-allocation-pie-charts.png
The S&P 500 provides targeted exposure to the U.S. market, while MSCI World diversifies across global developed countries by allocating regionally.
Owning both indexes can balance capturing America‘s growth with global coverage. But which approach is better today? Historical returns favor the S&P 500‘s U.S. concentration…but the future could see that shift.
Sector Allocation Comparison
sector-allocation-comparison-charts.png
Differences emerge here too – the S&P 500 tilts heavier toward information technology firms while MSCI World indexes greater towards financial services.
Ultimately the MSCI World Index takes a more balanced approach across countries and sectors. This decreases risk, but has hindered returns over the past decade as U.S. growth dominated.
Looking ahead, which index presents better growth potential combined with risk protection?
Future Outlook…Crystal Ball Says?
Historical data clearly shows the S&P 500 trouncing the MSCI World index over 3, 5 and 10 year measurement periods.
But global markets move in cycles. Fund managers and market strategists debate whether regions playing catch up could drive overseas stocks to outperform in the years ahead.
It‘s impossible to predict short-term market movements. But thinking long-term, here are a few key considerations that could shape relative future index performance:
Economic Growth Rates
If other developed countries ramp infrastructure investments and see accelerating productivity, their equity markets could narrow the gap.
Currency Shifts
40% of S&P 500 sales come internationally. So if the strong dollar reverses course, it may erode profits.
Relative Valuations
MSCI World currently trades at lower PE ratios than the S&P 500. Mean reversion could spur outperformance.
There are rational reasons to believe overseas regions are primed for a comeback. But failing to capture surging U.S. innovation could punish returns.
Ultimately, the future remains unpredictable. Staying diversified across markets while controlling costs offers a prudent approach.
Which is the Better Investment?
We‘ve covered a lot of ground comparing these indexes – from construction methodologies, historical returns across bull and bear cycles, fees and risks.
If your crystal ball predicts indefinite U.S. equity market leadership, the S&P 500 offers potential to capture further outperformance. Over 90% of the time over the past 20+ years it has outearned comparable global indexes. Riding America‘s economic engine has paid off in a huge way.
But for balanced global developed market exposure, MSCI World ETFs like VEU provide solid long-run return potential (7%+ over decades) with less volatility. Avoiding U.S. concentration risk protects against protracted underperformance periods.
The ideal solution? Apply wisdom from modern portfolio theory by allocating to both indexes. This lets investors benefit from U.S. upside while diversifying globally to smooth out volatility.
Within a domestic/international stock allocation, I personally advocate a tilt towards U.S. exposure due to the economy‘s consistent leadership. But overseas markets do warrant meaningful representation to hedge bets.
Recommended Investment Products
Gaining exposure to these indexes is straightforward via liquid, low-cost ETF products from leading issuers like Vanguard and iShares.
For the S&P 500, the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (ticker: VOO) is a top choice. With over $700 billion in assets and rock bottom 0.03% expense ratio, it offers unmatched cost efficiency.
For the MSCI World Index, the Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (ticker: VEU) shines. Charging just 0.07% annually, it provides diversified exposure to global developed markets outside the United States.
Between VOO and VEU, investors can build a foundational domestic/international allocation aligned to their personal risk tolerance and conviction in U.S. markets.
In Closing…
I hope this comprehensive S&P 500 vs MSCI World Index showdown presented helpful comparative analysis. When incorporated as core portfolio building blocks, both indexes can fuel growth over long time horizons.
The S&P 500 offers potential for standout returns in strong U.S. bull markets. Meanwhile MSCI World diversifies across global developed regions to smooth volatility. Blending exposure to both indexes while minimizing costs helps optimize the risk/return profile.
No matter which approach you favor, staying disciplined and avoiding reactionary moves amidst short-term noise gives compounding time to work its magic. I wish you prosperity on your investing journey!