Skip to content

Elasticsearch vs MongoDB: A Data Analyst‘s Guide on Which to Use

As companies gather more and more data, organizing and making sense of it efficiently becomes critical. This is where databases come in – they structure the data so it can power analytics and applications.

You may be familiar with traditional SQL databases for neatly organizing tabular data. But what about unstructured data like logs, images, social posts? That‘s where NoSQL document databases shine…

In this guide, we‘ll explore two popular options – Elasticsearch and MongoDB – to see the pros and cons of each. By the end, you‘ll know which one is best for your needs.

A Quick Intro

First, a quick overview:

Elasticsearch – Created in 2010 as an open-source search engine built on Apache Lucene. It excels at fast text search and analytics across huge datasets. Commonly used for log analysis and powering search.

MongoDB – Created in 2007 as an open-source, JSON-style document database designed for flexibility, scalability and high performance. Commonly used as a backend database for web and mobile apps.

So while both handle JSON docs and scale easily, Elasticsearch focuses on search while MongoDB focuses more on persistent storage and transactions.

The choice between them depends on the use case…let‘s explore further!

Key Differences

Feature Elasticsearch MongoDB
Created 2010 2007
Initial Use Case Search Engine Document Database
Primary Capabilities Search, Analytics Storage, Transactions
Data Format JSON BSON (binary JSON)
Query Language JSON + custom DSL MongoDB Query Language
Scalability Horizontal (scale-out) Horizontal

A core difference lies in the data format – Elasticsearch uses simple JSON documents while MongoDB uses a faster binary version called BSON under the hood.

This means MongoDB has some advantages when it comes to working directly with object data in applications, while Elasticsearch offers more flexibility for search and analytics queries.

Now let‘s dive deeper into the strengths of each one…

When to Use Elasticsearch

Elasticsearch stands out for a few key use cases:

Full Text Search

  • Its integrated Lucene search engine allows drilling down into massive volumes of text data across documents and logs with ease.
  • For example, StackOverflow uses Elasticsearch to power fast Q&A searches across millions of posts.
  • Results are ranked by relevance through customizable scoring algorithms unique to Elasticsearch.

Real-time Analytics

  • Aggregations and SQL-esque queries allow slicing and dicing data on the fly to spot trends and patterns.
  • For example, NASA uses Elasticsearch to analyze complex telemetry data in real-time from space missions.
  • This enables anomaly detection and predictive guidance.

Log Analysis

  • The ELK stack (Elasticsearch + Logstash + Kibana) excels at ingesting, storing, and allowing interactive search across machine-generated log data.
  • For example, Netflix uses the ELK stack to analyze billions of events a day from video streaming to optimize quality of experience.

So in summary, consider Elasticsearch if search relevancy, text analysis or real-time analytics are critical needs.

When to Use MongoDB

MongoDB has become hugely popular as a general purpose database for modern applications with requirements like:

Flexible Data Models

  • Its document model makes it ideal for handling varied, rapidly evolving data without restrictive schemas.
  • For example, MongoDB powers dynamic profile storage and newsfeed data behind social apps at bytes.
  • Fields can be added to documents without migrations.

High Performance

  • Native BSON processing and indexed queries allow low-latency reads and writes even at scale.
  • For example, Cisco uses MongoDB to manage IoT data ingestion peaking at over 1.3M ops/sec.
  • Tunable consistency and durable storage provide speed without sacrificing data integrity.

Scalability on Demand

  • Auto-sharding distributes data across nodes, enabling horizontal scaling to handle workload spikes.
  • For example, IBM Cloud builds large MongoDB clusters to scale capacity for thousands of databases.
  • This elasticity makes the economics very friendly while handling volatile traffic.

So in summary, consider MongoDB if schema flexibility, storage performance or scalability drive your requirements.

Benchmark Comparison

Let‘s compare the two options across some key performance criteria:

Benchmark Elasticsearch MongoDB
Query Speed Very Fast Very Fast
Scalability Massive scale-out Massive scale-out
Data Compression Good Excellent
Full-Text Search Excellent Decent
Spatial Search Excellent Basic
Transactions Limited (ACID) Rich (ACID)

While they share similarities in scale-out architecture and speed, each excels at different functions like search vs transactions. Choosing which one depends on your priorities.

Using Both Together

Now you might be wondering – since these databases are optimized for different workloads, could I use them together?

The answer is yes! Here are some examples:

  • Store transactional data in MongoDB for efficiency then replicate into Elasticsearch for analysis in real-time.
  • Manage users / products in MongoDB but feed subsets to Elasticsearch to power lightning fast search for the app.

This type of combined architecture is gaining popularity for both operational resilience and analytical agility. MongoDB even offers native replication connectors to sync datasets between the two databases automatically.

The bottomline – you can absolutely use both together to get the best of both worlds if needed.

Summary – Key Questions to Ask

When deciding between Elasticsearch and MongoDB, here are three key questions to ask about your use case:

  1. How critical is text search vs transactions? If heavy text search/analytics, lean Elasticsearch. If transactions dominate, lean MongoDB.

  2. How much flexibility around data structures is needed? If lots of fluid documents, lean MongoDB. If more fixed schemas, either could work.

  3. What scale and speed is required? Both can scale and perform wonderfully under load. Runtime benchmarks with real data would determine subtle differences.

Analyzing your specific needs around these critical performance attributes will clarify which database (or combination) suits best.

The world of data continues evolving rapidly. Thankfully with choices like Elasticsearch and MongoDB, engineers now have incredibly powerful and flexible building blocks for handling data at scale. Hopefully this guide helps you determine which tool is right for your next application!

Let me know if you have any other questions!