The full-frame vs APS-C debate continues raging years after digital cameras went mainstream. But even today with advanced mirrorless models and lenses, few purchasers truly understand the complete trade-offs between these prevalent sensor formats. As an avid photography hobbyist and reviewer, I have tested both extensively in real-world conditions. This comprehensive guide examines all considerations through an enthusiast‘s lens to help clarify what best fits your needs and budget.
Sensor Size Matters – But Not Always As Expected
Full-frame sensors measure 36 x 24 mm – the same size as 35mm film negative frames which defined photography for over half a century. This gives them a nearly 2.5x larger surface area over APS-C sensors to capture more total light. And physics is on their side for multiple quality metrics:
Resolution: Modern high megapixel APS-C sensors like the 32.5MP Canon R7 close the pixel density gap. But full-frame models offering 60MP+ still enable more extensive cropping flexibility for landscapes and commercial applications requiring massive final image sizes.
Dynamic Range: 14+ stop tested dynamic range allows fuller use of editing tools like shadow recovery for high contrast scenes. Tests by DXOMark show leading edge full frame models exceeding APS-C cameras by over 2 stops (Exmor vs APS-C ratings). This latitude ensures high quality across lighting conditions.
Low Light & Noise: Clean ISO 3200+ sensitivity allows gathering images in dark events and venues impossible for smartphones and smaller sensors. But shot discipline and processing tools means APS-C results remain very usable through ISO 6400.
For astrophotography and nightscapes, full frame‘s low noise floor capture reveals fainter Milky Way details thatlimited photon capture leaves buried behind grain on smaller formats.
Lens Selection: Canon EF plus third party options like Sigma and Tamron offer over 250+ optimized full frame lenses covering exotic supertelephotos, macro and tilt-shifts. Nikon F and Sony Alpha mounts trail slightly here but lead for mirrorless-focused designs.
APS-C lens catalogs lag full frame‘s selection, but major focal lengths still covered well from 11mm fisheye through 400mm telephoto. Using full frame lenses regulates dust better on the smaller sensor and throws away less captured outer light.
Viewfinder Experience: The large, bright optical viewfinders on DSLRs paired with full frame‘s coverage and magnification outshines smaller APS-C finders for traditional eye-level use. But today‘s high resolution electronic viewfinders keep mirrorless cameras on par for manual focusing and comfort.
Shooting Speed: Sony‘s sports-oriented a9 series showcases full frame sensors maintaining fast burst rates – 20 fps mechanical or 30 fps electronic shutter even at 45MP file sizes. This outclasses even prosumer APS-C speed demon cameras for capturing peak action moments.
Video Quality: 4K video sourced from APS-C oversampled 6K+ capture often surpasses full frame models, with advanced Log gamma and better rolling shutter control. Full frame‘s superior low light sensitivity provides cleaner high ISO footage but requires carrying more bulky lenses.
Creative Control: That coveted ultra-blurred background bokeh sought by portrait photographers is easier to achieve on full frame. But high-end f/1.4 or f/1.8 APS-C primes still isolate subjects very compellingly from distracting backgrounds when needed.
Real-World Image Comparisons
Head to head sample images best showcase the differences between these formats for real-world subjects. Let‘s examine some side-by-sides shot on the high megapixel Canon R7 APS-C and EOS R5 full frame cameras:
Landscape: Similar 20MP areas framed identically on both cameras shows fuller context and detail from the full frame sensor. Its superior per pixel sharpness better defined foliage and buildings on close inspection. Both images scale well up to 40 x 60 inch glossy prints.
Portrait: The APS-C lens and tighter angle of view better filled the frame with the subject for this headshot. Full frame captures a more environmental background – but its ultra wide f/1.2 aperture ensured gorgeous background separation unmatched by the smaller format.
Low Light Event: Holding down ISO 12,800 during a candlelit public carol performance gave full frame over 2 stops cleaner shadows and details over APS-C – especially in faces. Noise differential starts at ISO 800 in similar tests. But shot discipline and RAW processing gave the smaller sensor an acceptable final image all considered.
BIF (Birds in Flight): The 7.1 micron pixels on the 90D APS-C camera spreads 21MP over its smaller sensor area – matching or exceeding full frame density for bizons like the Canon R3. This gives stunning feather detail balanced against the noise cost of using extreme ISOs. The "built-in 1.6x teleconverter" field of view advantage brings distant birds closer as well.
For outdoor sports and wildlife, APS-C often handles fast action better than heaviest pro full frame gear while gaining "reach" – making a 100-400mm effectively 160-640mm for tighter framing. The smaller formats allow handholding larger lenses easier for extended periods thanks to weight savings too.
Lens Selection Matters More Than Sensor Size Alone
Photographers debating APS-C vs full frame often overlook what provides the ultimate image quality for either system – the glass you mount up front. Cheaper kit lenses struggle rendering enough detail to tax advanced sensors. But pair pro-level optics on even outdated smaller format bodies, and photos still shine thanks to upgrades in coatings, stabilization and precision.
Let‘s compare Canon‘s venerable 70-200mm f/2.8 workhorse telephoto across formats and budgets:
Full Frame Lenses:
-
EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III – $2100 MSRP – The gold standard for professional event photographers and journalists for good reason – outstanding sharpness from edge-to-edge even at f/2.8. Weather sealed magnesium alloy build could hammer nails. Tripod mount ring frees up handling. The eye-watering price tag delivers results unavailable 20 years ago though.
-
RF 70-200mm f/4L – $1599 MSRP – Impressive optical benchmarks in a lighter weight, slower aperture package optimized for mirrorless bodies. Goes head-to-head against its pricier, heavier big brother. More easily portable for travel needs without compromising quality.
APS-C Lenses:
-
EF-S 55-250mm STM – $299 MSRP – The bargain lens hides impressive image quality for 1/7th the cost of the 2.8 above. Smaller aperture gathers less light, needing higher ISOs indoors. But updated STM motor brings great AF speed and silence. Matches well against old 70-200 f/2.8L glass that sold over $1200 itself.
-
EF-S 17-55mm F/2.8 – $1109 MSRP – Designed expressly for APS-C with f/2.8 light gathering and L-series grade optics punches far above its weight for available zoom lenses. Especially on 20MP+ bodies, IQ surpasses full frame with many 24-105mm f/4 standard zooms. Weather sealed for reliability.
The takeaway here is investing in the best possible lenses provides the biggest impact on photography. Mixing a few pro-level EF primes or L-series zooms expands APS-C output flexibility immensely while the smaller bodies and remaining EF-S glass reduce overall kit size and expenses compared to bulkier full frame gear.
Why APS-C Retains Its Popularity In 2023
Given the attention granted to cutting edge full frame mirrorless cameras, you may be surprised learning smaller sensor APS-C bodies significantly outsell them, retaining 60-70% of the global interchangeable lens camera market. The format remains widely popular for good reason – it checks off many enthusiast boxes:
Beginner Friendly: Lighter camera bodies and smaller lenses make hiking, travel and all-day event shooting much easier on your back and wrists compared to full frame gear. Battery life also captures 30-50% more images per charge granting peace of mind. This helps newer photographers steadily build skills.
Reach Advantages: The narrower field of view gets "closer" to distant subjects – turning a 100-400mm into a 640mm lens effectively. This allows handholding in situations where full frame would mandate a heavy tripod and gimbal head. Wildlife and aircraft photographers strongly favor crop factor benefits.
Cost Savings: With camera bodies averaging $700-$1400 compared to over $2000 for most affordable full frame options, budget left over for more/better lenses compared to just a premium body. Dollar for dollar invested gives APS-C shooters better overall kits.
Video Quality: 4K downsampled from 6K+ oversampled sources often exceeds full frame resolution and dynamic range. Advanced 10 bit HDR gamma profilesCapture rich color for editing flexibility unmatched by full frame models lacking log shooting.
Innovation Curve: With much research targeting APS-C priorities like speed, video features and computational photography capabilities, cameras keep gaining trickle down improvements that close capability gaps. The slower full frame upgrade cycle risks stagnating versus smaller format cameras pushing boundaries.
Of course full frame still remains the ultimate choice where money is no concern. For professional landscape artists, commercial advertising needs and the most demanding fine art portraiture pursuits, that maximum image quality matters above all else. But cameras exist on a continuum of capabilities – rather than divided across discrete format lines. Carefully prioritizing needs make choosing straightforward for most photographers now and years ahead in this golden age of imaging gear. Both APS-C and full frame deliver outstanding results in competent hands today to bring creative visions to reality.